Prohibition of Flag Desecration is Unconstitutional :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Restriction of Flag Desecration is Unconstitutional At the point when individuals fix their eyes upon the fifty white stars and thirteen red and white stripes, they see a nation’s banner, yet an image that speaks to opportunity and solidarity. America, the nation of chance and freedom, is based on a majority rule government managed by the Bill of Rights. On the off chance that this banner speaks to the place where there is the free, at that point for what reason does Congress keep on dismissing the First Amendment and endeavor to pry a privilege out of American citizens’ hands? After Texas v. Johnson in 1989, when the Supreme Court contradicted the new banner consuming revision, the state resolutions restricting banner tainting additionally were struck down. From that point forward, Congress has attempted to pass The Flag Desecration Amendment in 1990, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, and 2003. The Flag Desecration Amendment expresses that â€Å"The Congress and the states will have capacity to deny the physical spoiling of the banner of the United States.† This correction is viewed as illegal in light of the fact that it restrains how residents communicate and their thoughts. As indicated by Professor Robert Justin Goldstein, just forty-five occurrences of despoiling have been recorded more than a long time since our banner was received. Our banner is in no impending peril, and numerous individuals bolster it by showing it on vehicles, structures, and homes. Truth be told, most of the burnings speak to issues or strategies of the legislature, and not disdain towards the nation. For instance, in 1970, protestors consumed banners to seethe against imperialistic international strategies and the Vietnam War. In spite of the fact that the profaning of our nation’s image is discouraging, ensuring our Bill of Rights ought to be Congress’s top need. Since the appropriation of the Bill of Rights in 1791, none of the first articles have been modified. The First Amendment unmistakably expresses that Congress can't build up a law that meddles with the right to speak freely, the opportunity of press, or the opportunity to amass a dissent.